HMOC
- Hybrid Modified Method of Characteristics mixes MOC
and MMOC based on specified criteria:
If control parameters for switching between MOC
and MMOC are set correctly, you can get accurate solutions for all Peclet numbers
with no dispersion
Away from that front advection is solved
by MMOC using packets placed at nodes and tracked backwards.
When the front dissipates (due to dispersion, reactions,
mixing) the forward tracking stops automatically and the packets are removed
If the flow field and dispersivity values are fairly constant and the gridding
is fairly regular you can select MOC or MMOC based on the grid Peclet #
When MOC requires too much computer time and
MMOC introduces "noticeable" numerical dispersion HMOC may be best
When HMOC is used a parameter DCHMOC is
defined by the modeler and compared to:
So if CMAX-CMIN for the entire grid is 10000
and near the node of interest the difference is 8000, that is a sharp front (0.8)
and MOC should be used whereas, if the difference near the node is 10 it is not
a sharp front (0.001) and MMOC can be used
CMAXi,j,k - maximum concentration near the cell
DCHMOC value is defined by
the user and it has been empirically determined that 0.001
to 0.01 are generally appropriate values
Sometimes it is difficult to find the right switching
parameters and it is better to just use MOC or MMOC
- Also, when feasible, it is best to work with Peclet numbers of 0 to
2