From Chamindu Deepagoda T.K.K., Kathleen M. Smits, and Curtis M. Oldenburg 2016, "Effect of subsurface soil moisture variability and atmospheric conditions on methane gas migration in shallow subsurface" published in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583616307460
In this work, we investigated multiphase processes controlling migration of methane from a point source representing a buried pipeline leaking at fixed flow rate (kg/s) under various saturation and soil-texture conditions. In addition, potential effects of atmospheric boundary controls, wind (0.5 and 2.0 m s-1) and temperature (22 and 35 °C), were also examined.
This work was accomplished through a series of controlled bench-scale experiments using a large porous media tank interfaced with an open-return wind tunnel.
Results showed the distinct effects of soil heterogeneity and, to a varying degree, of soil moisture on surface methane concentrations. In addition, results also showed the pronounced effects of wind and, to a lesser degree, of temperature on surface methane concentrations in the presence of varying soil and moisture conditions.
The METEC facility is part of CSU's Energy Institute, built to evaluate the performance of sensor technologies developed by the Department of Energy's ARPA-E MONITOR program. The test site (Figure 1) allows for the simulation of gas leakage from real-world natural gas operations at production and midstream facilities as well as underground natural gas pipelines.
Figure 1: METEC facility. Additional details on the overall site can be found at: https://energy.colostate.edu/areas-of-expertise/methane/
The METEC pipeline test bed (Figure 2) allows for the simulation of underground pipeline leaks at known leakage rates in varying subsurface and surface conditions. This test bed provides a unique opportunity to study the ability of detection technologies to identify and quantify leaks based on differences in subsurface (e.g. soil moisture, soil type, heterogeneity), surface (e.g. pavement, vegetation, standing water) and atmospheric (near-surface wind and temperature) conditions. All subsurface and surface conditions can be continuously monitored using soil moisture, temperature, pressure, humidity and wind speed sensors installed throughout the site. This test bed is an ideal location to evaluate leak detection sensitivities and detection limits, and to develop recommended practices for subsurface leak detection.
Figure 2: Pipeline testbed includes 5m x 10m homogeneous soil testbed with gas sample probes and soil moisture, temperature and pressure sensors (left), and 10m x 60m trenched lines in natural soil (center). Controlled subsurface emission points (right) are located throughout testbed in a variety of orientations and configurations. All images taken during construction prior to backfill.
For more information on the background for this project please visit: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=slick-sheet-project/monitor-field-test-site