PHGN 326: Advanced Physics Laboratory II Spring 2012
contacts || LABS || Schedule || Grading || Lab Reports || Academic Integrity || Useful Links
Meyer Hall 338 (office hours Monday, Wednesday 3:00 -5:30 pm)
Phone: (303) 384 2234
Email: lwiencke@mines.edu
TA: Tuesday Section
Alyssa Allende Motz aallende@mymail.mines.edu Office hours: GRL 139M Thu 4-6 pmTA: Thursday Section
Caleb Speirs jspeirs@mymail.mines.edu Office hours: MH 235 Mon 9-11 am
Recommended Text (Each group should have at least one copy)
Introduction to Error analysis (Taylor) ISBN-10: 093570275X ISBN-13: 978-0935702750
This second semester of the advanced laboratory course deals predominantly with nuclear and particle physics. 8 cool experiments are offered. To successfully complete this course, you will do 5 of them.
Instructions for the experiments are available in the links below:
1. Building and testing of a NaI detector
4. Energy loss of alpha particles
5. Alpha – Gamma coincidences
7. Cosmic-ray angular distribution
The laboratory is conducted every second week.
You are either in the Tuesday (PHGN326A) or the Thursday (PHGN326B) session.
We will work from 9:15am to 4pm with a lunch break from 12-1. Lab will be open at 9:00 AM.
On lab dates, each student will take a short closed book quiz from 9:15-9:30
The labs will be done in groups of 3 students. You will have the same lab partners for the semester.
Both sections (Tues or
Thurs) are split into 8 or 9 groups (A-I).
All groups have
to attend the introductory session for their day
The experiments
are
numbered 1-9.
|
Tue Thu |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
|
|
Jan 19 Jan 21 |
Lectures - attendance required |
||||||||
|
Jan 24 Jan 26 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Feb 7 Feb 9 |
7 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
Feb 21 Feb 23 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Mar 6 Mar 8 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
8 |
|
|
Apr 3 Apr 5 |
4 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
3 |
|
|
Apr 17 Apr 19 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
Grading:
5 lab reports 5/7 of the course grade.
Performance in Lab 1/7 of the course grade
Preparation for Lab 1/7 of the course grade (includes in-lab mini-quiz)
Grading of Reports:
Reports will be graded on a scale of 0-35 divided as follows
5 points – abstract
10 writing - clarity, and mechanics (references, grammar, spelling
10 data analysis/errors
10 figures and tables
All authors are ultimately responsible for all material in the report.
All authors will be assigned the same grade.
The number grades on reports translate to letter grades as follows: 30-35 A 25-29 B 20-24 C 15-20 D
Due Dates
Lab reports due 13 days by 6pm after lab date. For first lab report only, a draft of report due 1 week after lab.
Reports can be placed in my mail box in the physics office, or under my office door. Late reports are normally not accepted.
Reports are to be prepared with a word processor of your choosing (latex preferred, msword ok.) All figures and tables are to be numbered and have captions. Neatly produced handwritten diagrams of apparatus and sketches that illustrate oscilloscope signal properties are acceptable. Quantitative plots including spectra are to be displayed in your report in computer generated figures, not hand drawn sketches.
Length should be 4-8 pages, not including appendices. Reports
must be
stapled together securely. Instructor not responsible for pages
that are
not securely stapled together.
Lab Report Sections read carefully!
Note: No Procedure, No Table of Contents
Cover page including abstract Cover page to follow format of Example here
Abstract.
Should be 4-8 sentences. 1-2 about the physics you are investigating, 1-2 about the apparatus and method. 1-2 about the results. If results are quantitative, quote number and errors. If your results are many numbers, show a few as examples.
Section: Apparatus
Figures (1-3
diagrams with labels and captions)
Clearly labeled diagram of the entire system including computer data
acquisition system and detector. In some cases a block diagram is
best.
The caption should include a few sentences about key features.
Second diagram with showing just the detector and the source (s).
Writing
A detailed discussion of the apparatus is already in the lab handout.
You will write 1 paragraph explaining what the apparatus actually measures. Think carefully here.
Do
not write a section on procedure. One
is already written in the handout. If you try something extra because
you are
curious, describe this in one concise paragraph.
Section:
Data Collected
This contains the raw data and the starting point of your data analysis
Section:
Data Analysis and
estimation of uncertainties
This section explains your data analysis and how you
calculated/estimated the
experimental uncertainties. You may wish to put in key equations, and a
sample
calculation.
Section:
Results and discussion
of results
Present the qualitative results of the data and error analysis. This is
typically one or more plots and a table, Write a few paragraph
describing the
results including errors.
Section:
Conclusion
What conclusions about the physics you investigated may or may not be
drawn
based on your results and why? Think carefully about the physics,
what
the apparatus actually measured, and what the results, including errors
actually show. This is an exercise in critical thinking demonstrated by
clear
writing.
Section:
References
Each reference
should start with a citation number that
also appears at the appropriate location in the text. When
possible,
reference the original material, ie journal articles or books.
For example do not
reference material contained in a journal paper using a web link.
Reference the actual journal article. Wiki references are
not
allowed.
Section: Appendix
Any other discussion or comments.
A copy of the lab notebook pages written during the lab from all
members.
“Plagiarism - presenting the work of another as one's own. This is usually accomplished through the failure to acknowledge the borrowing of ideas, data, or the words of others. Examples include submitting as one's own work the work of another student, a ghost writer, or a commercial writing service; quoting, either directly or paraphrased, a source without appropriate acknowledgment; and using figures, charts, graphs or facts without appropriate acknowledgment. Inadvertent or unintentional misuse or appropriation of another's work is nevertheless plagiarism.”
Quoted from Student Honor Code, Colorado School of Mines
Undergraduate Bulletin
Lab reports must adhere to this standard.
Reports that
contain plagiarized material, and in
particular text copied from other sources, including the lab handout,
without
proper acknowledgement will be assigned a grade of zero.
Write in your own words.
Include plenty of
references. If you must quote a short
piece of text from a source, the text must be in quotes and accompanied
by a
specific reference for the source.
Acknowledgement
This course was extensively
revised by
Prof.
Greife prior to 2007. Many of these the experiments are the result
of his considerable effort, ingenuity, and equipment scrounging.